Ty naprawde potarfisz dopasowac swoj swiatopoglad do kazdej sytuacji i kreatywnie naginac prawde. Przeciez to co wkleiles to nie pochodzi z
budzetu panstwa jak cos sie nazywa insurance to pomysl o tym w pierwszej kolejnosci jako czyms za co sie placi samemu, a nie jak to bywa w EU jest tozsame z panstwem.
Cytuj:
Japanese unemployment insurance is closer to the US or Canadian "user pays" system than the taxpayer funded systems in place in countries such as the United Kingdom, New Zealand, or Australia. It is paid for by contributions by both the employer and employee.
Premiums are calculated as a certain percentage of each worker's total wage. Under the latest revision in April 2012, the insurance premium rate is 1.35% (the employer paying 0.85% and the worker paying 0.5%) with the exception of a few kinds of jobs.
The circumstances under which an employee left their position affect eligibility, timing, and amount of benefits. The length of time that unemployed workers can receive benefits depends on the age of the employee, and how long they have been employed and paying in.
It is supposed to be compulsory for most full-time employees. If they have been enrolled for at least six months and are fired or made redundant, leave the company at the end of their contract, or their contract is non-renewed, the now-unemployed worker will receive unemployment insurance. If a worker quit of their own accord they may have to wait between one and three months before receiving any payment.
Wiec jak ty probujesz tutaj wmowic ze w Japoni jest system taki jak w krajach EU to powodzenia. Ten system jest czyms kompletnie innym, no ale ty jak to ty lubisz przytrolowac jak z ta dywersyfikacja gospodarek petrodolarowych krajow takze rozumiem
